Is there a big difference between a DVD upconverter and a HD DVD Player? - my dvd upconverter stopped working
I recently purchased an HD-DVD, Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player. The price of HD-DVD is a significant amount over a DVD upconverter. I was told that the HD-DVD player can convert standard DVDs in HD quality. What am I missing? It seems that both devices have the same, but different prices.
What is better? Can I have the same quality and less for the purchase of a single boost converter as an HD-DVD?
Friday, January 15, 2010
My Dvd Upconverter Stopped Working Is There A Big Difference Between A DVD Upconverter And A HD DVD Player?
4 comments:
Yes
The HD DVD has many advantages, with any DVD player upscaling. A quality sound.
Not even if you decrypt a surround processor for the new DTS-HD or Dolby Digital HD again. I am sure you will love it if you get too.
Play all your DVDs, CDs. I know that the LG is no CD is read. Can you believe that you can not read CDs, after payment of $ 1100.00 for this device, six months ago. Oh well.
When I again want to start over an HD DVD player and a Bul-ray buy separately.
She said: "I said the HD DVD player to regular DVDs to HD quality to convert."
Unfortunately, you have said is wrong. Upconverter DVD players look better image progressive DVD or regular, but not on the HD DVD quality compared.
All this information is in assuming that you have an HDTV-compatible.
-HD DVD player as an upward-moving DVD player, DVDs, convert the sound, however, is only pseudo-HD. But well done) (in a good upconverter, the image can be much better than DVD "plain vanilla" (though still below the actual HD DVD). The problem is the relative difference in quality and price.
I answered a similar question not repeat, so much of the information. Take a look at this link (and read the reference to the articles, why it may be advantageous to scale player).
I have an HD-A2 and I use it primarily as a DVD player for my upscaling 720p projector and 110 "screen (I see little advantage to HD DVD, at least not enough to justify the high cost of value Apart from a few sentences that you really enjoy the high definition (for me it's not a viable option disk lease)). I think from my HD-A2 for a good upscaling DVD player that also plays HD DVD of the few times where I want to disturb them. For me it is worth the relatively small increase in price does not exceed an escalation of good HD-DVD player (eg Oppo 981, $ 229) only have the ability to read HD DVDs when I want. Of course, the price can more than one player cheaper upscaling ... But those do not work well (see article above) and are a waste of money.
However, depending on what you paid (for example, the sale price or regular price $ 99 $ 300) is more or less of a market. When I think today I consider the risk model in the USA at Walmart for 197 $. This is known Toshiba HD-A3.
Hope this helps.
Improving the resolution does not change the amount of picture data information that you see. DVD Release maximum of 480 x 720 pixels (approx. 300,000) HD-DVD and Blu-Ray maximum output of 1080 x 1920 pixels. (2,067,000) This is an increase of 7 times the image detail!
If you have a 1080p TV, and do not believe the HD-A2 and HD-A3 family of DVD players. They are only 1080i or 720p.
If this is true AGB90 720p projector, you should x 720 1200 pixels, three times better than a higher resolution to see DVD. (approx. 1,000,000 pixels) does not understand why it is more something the size of a 110 "screen impressed. What I mean more visible area, additional information is valuable. His answer is rather subjective and certainly respect his opinion.
Audiotech is right on the money with his improvement. It will be a thumbs up from me.
I like the Blu-Ray/HD-DVD/DVD-Player from LG. It is a pity, CD does not play, but probably ran out of the room and there was another meeting of the laser diode inside. If I had the LG, I would probably buy a cheap computer instead of a CD and copy all my CDs to MP3 or FLAC 330 bps. It is much easier than playing with the CD.
Post a Comment